Škoda Kodiaq length: all dimensions, comparison with competitors and practical tips

Choosing a crossover often comes down to a compromise between interior space and ease of driving in the city. Škoda Kodiaq is one of the leaders in the class of large SUVs, but its dimensions may raise questions among potential owners. How much space does this Czech “giant” take up on the road? How does its length affect parking, maneuverability and passenger comfort? In this article we will analyze all the nuances, compare Kodiaq with the main competitors and give practical recommendations on choosing a modification.

Spoiler: The length of the second generation Kodiaq (2026+) has increased by 61 mm compared to its predecessor, but the wheelbase remains the same - 2791 mm. This decision of the manufacturer turned out to be controversial: on the one hand, the trunk grew, on the other, parking in cramped yards became more difficult. Next, you will find out how these changes affect everyday use and whether it is worth overpaying for the extended version Kodiaq RS.

Official dimensions of the Škoda Kodiaq: comparison of generations

First generation Škoda Kodiaq (2017–2023) had a length 4697 mm, making it one of the most compact cars in the 7-seater SUV class. The second generation (from 2026) has grown to 4758 mm — the increase was 61 mm. At the same time, the width and height remained practically unchanged: 1882 mm and 1676 mm, respectively. The wheelbase (2791 mm) has also not changed, which means maintaining the same legroom for second-row passengers.

Interesting fact: despite the increase in length, ground clearance Kodiaq decreased from 194 mm to 190 mm. This is due to the transition to the platform MQB Evo, which involves a lower center of gravity for improved handling. However, for Russian roads such clearance can become a problem - we will talk about this in the section on cross-country ability.

Parameter	Kodiaq I (2017–2023)	Kodiaq II (2026–present)	Kodiaq RS (2026–present)
Length, mm	4697	4758	4758
Width, mm	1882	1882	1882
Height, mm	1676	1659–1676*	1659
Wheelbase, mm	2791	2791	2791
Ground clearance, mm	194	190	185

*Height depends on the configuration: the basic version is 17 mm lower due to a different suspension.

Comparing with competitors, Kodiaq remains the "golden mean": it is shorter Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace (4770 mm), but longer Hyundai Santa Fe (4785 mm in the new generation). At the same time, in terms of internal space, the Czech crossover often wins due to a more rational organization of the interior. For example, trunk Kodiaq (270–2065 l) more volume than Toyota Highlander (231–1982 l), despite similar external dimensions.

How the length of the Kodiaq affects parking and maneuverability

The 61mm increase in length may not seem like much, but in tight parking lots or garages it becomes noticeable. For example, when parallel parking Kodiaq II will require for 10–15 cm more spacethan its predecessor. This is especially critical for owners who are used to parking close to other cars or walls.

A few practical observations:

• 🅿️ In a standard parking space (5.3x2.5 m) Kodiaq fits with a margin of ~30 cm in front and back. However, when opening the rear row doors, there may not be enough space for passengers to exit.
• 🔄 The turning radius has increased from 11.1 m to 11.3 m. This is not critical for the city, but on narrow roads you will have to make one more turn of the steering wheel.
• 🚪 Doorways Kodiaq wider than competitors (for example, Nissan X-Trail), which compensates for the increased length when boarding/disembarking.

Tip for urban environments: use the function Park Assist (available in configurations Style and RS). It automatically calculates the trajectory and controls the steering wheel, but requires minimum 1.2 m headroom in front and behind the car. In tight yards, it’s better to rely on 360-degree cameras (Area View), which give a more accurate picture.

⚠️ Warning: When towing a trailer, the total length of the combination may exceed 7 meters (maximum permissible for category B). For example, Kodiaq + trailer Škoda with a length of 2500 mm = 7258 mm. In some EU countries this requires an additional category BE.

Comparison with competitors: who is longer, who is more compact

In the large SUV class Škoda Kodiaq occupies an intermediate position in length. For clarity, let’s compare it with its main competitors in the table below. Please note: some models (eg Ford Explorer) are 20–30 cm longer, but at the same time have a smaller trunk due to a different distribution of internal space.

Model	Length, mm	Wheelbase, mm	Trunk (min/max), l	7 seats (optional)
Škoda Kodiaq II	4758	2791	270 / 2065	Yes
Volkswagen Tiguan Allspace	4770	2791	230 / 1775	Yes
Hyundai Santa Fe 2026	4785	2815	242 / 1980	No
Toyota Highlander	4966	2850	231 / 1982	Yes
Ford Explorer	5050	3025	198 / 1818	Yes

Key takeaways from the comparison:

• 📏 Kodiaq in short Toyota Highlander by 208 mm, but at the same time has a larger trunk (2065 l versus 1982 l). This is achieved by a more vertical rear door.
• 🪑 By wheelbase Škoda loses Hyundai Santa Fe (2791 mm vs 2815 mm), but wins in interior width (1882 mm vs 1880 mm).
• 💺 Ford Explorer longer by 292 mm, but its trunk is 247 liters smaller. This is due to the more sloping roof and the emphasis on design over practicality.

If the length of the car is critical for you, but you need 7 seats, pay attention to Peugeot 5008 (4641 mm) or Citroën Grand C4 SpaceTourer (4605 mm). They are shorter Kodiaq by 10–15 cm, but offer similar capacity. However, in terms of cross-country ability and status, these models are inferior to the Czech crossover.

The effect of length on the trunk and seats

Length increase Kodiaq II 61 mm went mainly to the luggage compartment. Trunk volume in the minimum configuration increased from 270 liters to 340 l (according to Škoda for the European market). In the maximum configuration (with the seats folded), the volume remains the same - 2065 liters, but the shape of the trunk has become more practical by reducing the “step” between the folded rows.

Let's take a closer look at how length affects the internal space:

• 🪑 First row: The legroom for the driver and front passenger has not changed (1035 mm). However, in the version RS the seats have more aggressive lateral support, which may create discomfort for overweight people.
• 👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Second row: Despite the increase in body length, legroom remains the same (910 mm) due to the unchanged wheelbase. However, the width of the cabin (1520 mm) allows three passengers to comfortably accommodate.
• 🧒 Third row: The changes are noticeable here. B Kodiaq II The third row seats are moved back by 30 mm, which gives additional 5 cm of knee space. However, height above 175 cm will still be uncomfortable for long trips.
• 🛄 trunk: now the minimum configuration fits 2 suitcases L (75×50×30 cm) instead of one in the previous generation. With the third row folded, there are 5 suitcases.

For clarity, here is a comparison of luggage racks in different configurations:

Configuration	Kodiaq I (2017–2023)	Kodiaq II (2026–present)	Gain
5 seats (all rows raised)	270 l	340 l	+70 l
7 seats (third row raised)	205 l	245 l	+40 l
Third row folded	630 l	690 l	+60 l
Second and third rows folded	2065 l	2065 l	0 l

Practical advice: if you often transport large loads (for example, a baby stroller or bicycle), pay attention to the option Easy Open — automatic trunk opening with foot movement. B Kodiaq II The sensor is located lower, which makes it easier to trigger when approaching with heavy bags.

How to fold seats in Kodiaq in 30 seconds?

1. Press the lever on the backrest of the second row (right or left).

2. Lift the seat up until it locks (it will lock automatically).

3. For the third row, pull the strap on the headrest - the backrest folds into the floor niche.

Important: Before folding, check that the seat belts are not twisted, otherwise the mechanism may jam.

Cross-country ability and ground clearance: how length affects geometry

Reducing ground clearance from 194 mm to 190 mm Kodiaq II raised many questions from potential buyers. This is especially true for regions with bad roads or snowy winters. However, the length of the car plays no less a role in cross-country ability than ground clearance. Let's look at the key aspects:

Approach/departure angles:

• 📉 Approach angle: 18° (was 19° in the first generation). This means that when overcoming high curbs or leaving the highway onto a dirt road, the front bumper will catch earlier.
• 📈 Departure angle: 22° (unchanged). Here the length of the body does not play a big role, since the rear overhang remains the same.
• 🔄 Ramp angle (longitudinal flotation): 16° (was 17°). This is critical for overcoming ridges or deep holes.

In practice this means that Kodiaq II has become a little less suitable for off-road use, but the difference is not critical for most owners. For example, when entering a parking lot with a high curb (20 cm), the front bumper will hit 2–3 cm earlier than its predecessor. The solution is to use the option Off-Road Mode (available in configurations Scout and RS), which raises the body by 15 mm due to air suspension.

For comparison: Toyota RAV4 (wheelbase 2690 mm) approach angle is 19°, despite its shorter length. This is achieved due to a shorter front overhang. If cross-country ability is important to you, pay attention to Škoda Kodiaq Scout - it has:

• 🛡️ Crankcase and transmission protection (standard).
• 🔧 Air suspension with increased ground clearance (up to 205 mm).
• 🎯 system Drive Mode Select with the regime Snow/Mud.

⚠️ Attention: When installing winter tires on Kodiaq Please note that the wheels have a diameter of 20" and higher, the ground clearance is reduced by 5–10 mm due to the smaller tire profile. For example, transition from 235/55 R19 on 255/45 R20 reduces ground clearance to 180 mm.

Kodiaq RS: longer, lower, faster - is it worth the extra money?

Version Kodiaq RS has the same external dimensions as the standard model (4758 mm), but differs in key parameters:

• 📉 Ground clearance: 185 mm (15 mm lower than the basic version).
• 🚀 Dynamics: acceleration to 100 km/h in 6.6 s (versus 8.5 s 1.5 TSI).
• 🎯 Suspension: stiffer, with adaptive shock absorbers DCC.
• 💺 Seats: sports, with reinforced lateral support.

In terms of length and practicality RS loses to the standard version:

• 🛄 The trunk is 20 liters smaller due to the hybrid system battery (in the version RS iV).
• 🪑 Legroom in the second row is reduced by 10mm due to the beefier front seats.
• 🛣️ Reduced ground clearance limits cross-country ability: for example, on gravel roads the risk of bumper damage is 30% higher.

Who is it suitable for? Kodiaq RS?

• ✅ For those who value dynamics and are preparing to drive mainly on asphalt.
• ✅ For owners who value image and sporty design.
• ❌ Not suitable for families with children (due to the hard suspension) or those living in regions with bad roads.

Cost RS 15–20% higher than the basic version, but at the same time fuel consumption is 1–1.5 l/100 km higher. For example, RS 2.0 TSI (245 hp) in the city it consumes ~11 l/100 km versus 9.5 l in 1.5 TSI (150 hp). If efficiency is critical for you, pay attention to the hybrid version iV, which combines the dynamics RS with a consumption of 6.5 l/100 km.

Measure the height of the curbs near the house (should be ≤15 cm)|Check the availability of service centers with lifts for low cars|Assess the comfort of the rear seats (put an adult passenger there)|Compare the cost of insurance (RS is 20–30% more expensive)-->

Selection tips: which Kodiaq length is right for you

Choice of modification Kodiaq depends on your priorities. Here is a checklist to help you decide:

1. For the city and parking:

• 🏙️ Optimal choice: Kodiaq 1.5 TSI (base length 4758 mm).
• 🅿️ Advantages: more compact than competitors, more maneuverable on narrow streets.
• ⚠️ Cons: trunk is smaller than Hyundai Santa Fe.

2. For a family with 2–3 children:

• 👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Optimal choice: Kodiaq 2.0 TSI 4x4 with option 7 seats.
• ✅ Advantages: spacious second row, large trunk (690 liters with the third row folded).
• 🔄 Tip: order the option Slide & Recline for the second row - this will allow you to adjust the legroom.

3. For off-road and travel:

• 🏔️ Optimal choice: Kodiaq Scout with air suspension.
• ✅ Advantages: ground clearance up to 205 mm, crankcase protection, all-wheel drive Haldex 5.
• 🚗 Alternative: If you need more length for your luggage, consider Volkswagen Atlas (5037 mm), but be prepared for parking problems.

4. For speed lovers:

• 🏎️ Optimal choice: Kodiaq RS 2.0 TSI (245 hp).
• ⚡ Advantages: acceleration to 100 km/h in 6.6 seconds, sporty design.
• ⚠️ Cons: stiff suspension, lower ground clearance, expensive maintenance.

If you are in doubt between Kodiaq and competitors, use a simple rule:

• 📏 If you need maximum length for luggage → Toyota Highlander or Ford Explorer.
• 🔄 If important balance between size and handling → Škoda Kodiaq or Hyundai Santa Fe.
• 💰 If the priority is price and practicality → Kia Sorento (shorter by 5 cm, but cheaper by 10–15%).

FAQ: answers to frequently asked questions about the length of the Škoda Kodiaq

📏 What is the minimum garage size required for the Kodiaq?

For comfortable parking Škoda Kodiaq II A garage with a depth of at least 5.3 m and width 2.3 m. If the garage is narrower, you will have to park backwards and use cameras Area View. Please note that when the doors are open, an additional 50 cm will be required on each side.

🅿️ Can the Kodiaq be parked in a standard parking space?

Yes, but with reservations. A standard parking space in Russia has dimensions of 5.3x2.5 m. Kodiaq (length 4758 mm) fits with a margin of ~55 cm, but:

• When opening the rear row doors, there may not be enough space for passengers to exit.
• In tight yards, it is better to park backwards using cameras and sensors.
• In version RS The front bumper is lower, so the risk of catching a curb is higher.

🚗 How does the length of the Kodiaq affect fuel consumption?

Increasing the length by 61 mm in itself has a negligible effect on consumption. However, in Kodiaq II aerodynamics changed (Cx coefficient decreased from 0.33 to 0.31), which reduced highway consumption by ~0.2 l/100 km. In the city the difference is unnoticeable. Main factors influencing consumption:

• Engine: 1.5 TSI consumes ~9.5 l/100 km, 2.0 TSI — ~10.5 l/100 km.
• Drive: all-wheel drive 4x4 increases consumption by 0.5–0.8 l/100 km.
• Wheels: tires 20" and higher increase consumption by 0.3–0.5 l/100 km.

🔧 Is it possible to increase the ground clearance of a Kodiaq after purchase?

Yes, but with reservations. There are several ways:

1. Spacers for springs: will increase the ground clearance by 20–30 mm, but will worsen handling. Cost: ~15,000 rub.
2. Air suspension: official option for Scout, can be installed on other versions. Cost: ~250,000 rub.
3. Replacing wheels: switch to disks 17" with high-profile tires (for example, 235/65 R17) will add ~10 mm ground clearance.

⚠️ Important: any changes to the suspension may affect the operation of safety systems (ESP, Lane Assist). We recommend that you coordinate modifications with an official dealer.

🆚 Why is the Kodiaq longer than the Octavia Combi?

Škoda Kodiaq longer Octavia Combi on 868 mm (4758 mm vs 3890 mm). The difference is noticeable in everything:

• trunk: y Kodiaq 270–2065 l, y Octavia Combi — 640–1700 l.
• Legroom: on the second row Kodiaq gives +12 cm.
• Controllability: Octavia more maneuverable in the city, but Kodiaq more stable on the track.
• Price: the difference between the basic versions is ~500,000 rubles.

The choice depends on priorities: if you need space and versatility, take Kodiaq. If efficiency and compactness are important - Octavia Combi.