ล KODA Kodiaq is the flagship crossover of the Czech brand, which combines a spacious interior, off-road capabilities and a wide selection of power units. One of the key parameters when purchasing is engine displacement: dynamics, fuel consumption, taxes and even driving comfort depend on it. In this article we will analyze all available motors for Kodiaq (including restyled versions), their technical characteristics, pros and cons, and we will also give recommendations for selection depending on operating conditions.
Since the model debuted in 2017, the engine lineup has undergone several updates. Under the hood today Kodiaq you can find gasoline units with a capacity 1.5 l, 2.0 l (in different modifications) and diesel 2.0 TDI. Each of them has unique features: from efficiency to high-torque. But how not to make a mistake with your choice? Next is a detailed analysis with numbers, tables and expert conclusions.
All engines ล KODA Kodiaq (2017โ2026): volumes and modifications
During production Kodiaq was offered with seven different power units, but five of them are most common in the Russian and European markets. They all belong to the family EA211 (gasoline) and EA288 (diesel) concern Volkswagen Group, which guarantees reliability and compatibility with other brand models (for example, Volkswagen Tiguan or Audi Q5).
Here is a complete list of engines indicating size, power and years of manufacture:
- ๐น 1.5 TSI (150 hp) โ gasoline, turbo, volume 1.5 l (1498 cmยณ), debuted in 2020 after facelift.
- ๐น 2.0 TSI (190 hp) โ gasoline, turbo, volume 2.0 l (1984 cmยณ), basic version for most markets.
- ๐น 2.0 TSI (220 hp) โ gasoline, turbo, volume 2.0 l, modification with increased power (available from 2017).
- ๐น 2.0 TSI (245 hp) โ gasoline, turbo, volume 2.0 l, top version for models Kodiaq RS (since 2018).
- ๐น 2.0 TDI (150 hp) โ diesel, turbo, volume 2.0 l (1968 cmยณ), economical option for long trips.
- ๐น 2.0 TDI (190 hp) โ diesel, turbo, volume 2.0 l, a more powerful diesel version (available in Europe).
- ๐น 2.0 TDI (240 hp) โ diesel, biturbo, volume 2.0 l, rare modification for Kodiaq RS (from 2020).
Only gasoline engines were officially supplied to Russia 1.5 TSI, 2.0 TSI (190/220 hp) and diesel 2.0 TDI (150 hp). After 2022, due to changes in legislation, diesel versions are no longer offered on the local market.
- 1.5 TSI (economical)
- 2.0 TSI 190 hp (universal)
- 2.0 TSI 220+ hp (dynamic)
- 2.0 TDI (long-distance diesel)
Technical characteristics: comparison table
To objectively assess the differences between the engines, letโs look at the manufacturerโs official data. Below is a table with key parameters: power, torque, acceleration to 100 km/h and fuel consumption (combined cycle). All values are valid for models with 7-speed DSG robot and all-wheel drive 4ร4 (where applicable).
| Engine model | Volume (cmยณ) | Power (hp) | Torque (Nm) | Acceleration 0โ100 km/h (s) | Fuel consumption (l/100 km) | Max. speed (km/h) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.5 TSI | 1498 | 150 | 250 | 9.8 | 6.5โ6.9 | 200 |
| 2.0 TSI (190 hp) | 1984 | 190 | 320 | 8.0 | 7.2โ7.6 | 210 |
| 2.0 TSI (220 hp) | 1984 | 220 | 350 | 7.2 | 7.5โ7.9 | 220 |
| 2.0 TDI (150 hp) | 1968 | 150 | 340 | 10.1 | 5.2โ5.6 | 195 |
| 2.0 TDI (190 hp) | 1968 | 190 | 400 | 8.6 | 5.8โ6.2 | 210 |
Important: fuel consumption data is based on the European WLTP cycle and may differ by 10โ15% in real operating conditions (especially in urban mode or at low temperatures).
From the table it is clear that diesel engines They win in terms of efficiency, but lose in dynamics. Gasoline 2.0 TSI with power from 190 hp. offer an optimal balance, and 1.5 TSI suitable for a quiet ride around the city.
1.5 TSI: pros and cons of the smallest engine
Engine 1.5 TSI appeared in the lineup Kodiaq after facelift in 2020 and became a response to the requests of buyers looking for an economical option. This unit is equipped with a system ACT (Active Cylinder Technology), which turns off two cylinders at low loads, reducing fuel consumption. However, this solution also has a downside.
Advantages of 1.5 TSI:
- ๐ฐ Low cost of ownership: cheaper to maintain, lower transport tax (in Russia - 3.5 rubles/hp versus 5 rubles/hp for engines over 200 hp).
- ๐ฟ Environmental friendliness: conforms to standard Euro 6d, which is relevant for European markets with strict regulations.
- ๐๏ธ Ideal for the city: compact weight (a crossover with this engine is 50โ70 kg lighter) improves handling.
Disadvantages of 1.5 TSI:
- ๐ข Weak dynamics: When fully loaded (7 seats + luggage), acceleration to 100 km/h takes almost 11 seconds.
- ๐ฃ๏ธ Problems on the track: overtaking requires a preliminary reduction in gear, since the โpickupโ at high speeds is weak.
- ๐ง ACT system resource: cylinder deactivation can lead to increased wear of the piston group during aggressive driving.
โ ๏ธ Attention: Upon purchase Kodiaq with 1.5 TSI, pay attention to the year of manufacture. In the 2020โ2021 models, there were problems with the software of the engine control unit, leading to โfailuresโ during acceleration. The problem can be solved by reflashing it at an official dealer.
If you often drive with a full load (eg large family + luggage), a test drive of the 1.5 TSI is a must! Try to accelerate on a hill - this will show the real capabilities of the engine.
2.0 TSI: which option to choose - 190, 220 or 245 hp?
Two-liter turbo engines 2.0 TSI - the most popular in the line Kodiaq. They offer a better balance between power and efficiency, but differ in performance. Let's look at each option in detail.
2.0 TSI (190 hp) โ a basic version that will suit most buyers. Its features:
- โก Sufficient dynamics: acceleration to 100 km/h in 8 seconds - this is enough for confident overtaking.
- ๐ Reliability: This motor is used in Volkswagen Passat and Audi A4, which confirms its verification.
- ๐ง Fuel consumption: in the combined cycle - about 7.5 l/100 km, which is acceptable for a crossover of this size.
2.0 TSI (220 hp) โ the โgolden meanโ for those who want more power without a significant increase in consumption. Differences from the 190-horsepower version:
- ๐ Improved overclocking: 0โ100 km/h in 7.2 seconds (0.8 s faster).
- ๐ง Modified turbine: turbine is used IHI IS20which can withstand higher loads.
- ๐ธ Tax difference: in Russia tax on 220 hp. will be higher by 700โ900 rubles per year compared to 190 hp.
2.0 TSI (245 hp) - top version for Kodiaq RS. This motor is intended for lovers of sports driving, but has its own nuances:
- ๐ Maximum speed: electronically limited to 220 km/h (without limiter - up to 240 km/h).
- ๐ข๏ธ Increased consumption: in the city it can reach 12โ14 l/100 km with an aggressive driving style.
- ๐ฅ Fuel requirements: recommended
AI-98, although it is allowedAI-95(with power loss up to 5%).
View service history (especially timing chain replacement every 150,000 km)|
Check the turbine for play (characteristic โwhistleโ during acceleration) |
Make sure there are no errors on the oxygen sensors (a common problem after 100,000 km) |
Cold test drive (checking idle speed stability) -->
Diesel 2.0 TDI: is it worth overpaying?
Diesel engines 2.0 TDI in Kodiaq presented in three power options: 150, 190 and 240 hp. In Russia, only the 150-horsepower version was officially sold, but more powerful versions can be found on the secondary market. Let's consider who is suitable for diesel and what features it has.
Advantages of the 2.0 TDI:
- โฝ Economical: combined cycle consumption - 5.2โ5.6 l/100 km (20โ30% less than gasoline counterparts).
- ๐ช Torque: 340โ400 Nm available from 1500 rpm, ideal for towing or off-road driving.
- ๐ Long distance travel: power reserve on one tank (60 l) - up to 1000 km on the highway.
Disadvantages of the 2.0 TDI:
- โ๏ธ Problems in winter: Diesel fuel waxes at โ20ยฐC and requires winter diesel fuel or additives.
- ๐ฐ Expensive service: oil change every 15,000 km (versus 20,000 km for gasoline), filters and glow plugs are more expensive.
- ๐ซ Restrictions in Russia: from 2022 diesel Kodiaq are not officially supplied, spare parts may be in short supply.
Critical Information: Diesel Engines EA288 sensitive to fuel quality. The use of low-quality diesel fuel leads to failure of fuel equipment (injectors and injection pumps), the repair of which costs 150,000โ250,000 rubles.
โ ๏ธ Attention: When buying used Kodiaq 2.0 TDI be sure to check the condition of the particulate filter (DPF). Replacing it costs 80,000โ120,000 rubles, and cleaning is required every 80,000โ100,000 km. Signs of malfunction: increased fuel consumption, black smoke from the exhaust pipe, error P242F.
What engine size to choose: recommendations for scenarios
Selecting engine size for ล KODA Kodiaq depends on your priorities: budget, driving style, operating conditions. Below are expert recommendations for different scenarios.
For the city and family trips:
- ๐ข 1.5 TSI (150 hp) โ if your budget is limited and you donโt plan to travel often with a full load.
- ๐ 2.0 TSI (190 hp) - a universal option that will not let you down either in traffic jams or on the highway.
For long trips and highways:
- ๐ฃ๏ธ 2.0 TSI (220 hp) โ optimal balance of power and comfort at high speeds.
- โฝ 2.0 TDI (150โ190 hp) - if efficiency is a priority and you are ready to put up with the features of a diesel engine.
For off-road and towing:
- ๐๏ธ 2.0 TDI (190 hp) - the best choice due to high torque at low speeds.
- ๐ 2.0 TSI (220โ245 hp) โ if you need power for a trailer (max. weight up to 2.2 tons).
For sport riding:
- ๐๏ธ 2.0 TSI (245 hp, Kodiaq RS) - the only option with the dynamics of a hatchback, but with fuel consumption like an SUV.
If you are choosing between 1.5 TSI and 2.0 TSI (190 hp), keep in mind that the difference in the cost of ownership over 5 years can be up to 200,000 rubles in favor of the 1.5-liter engine (due to taxes and fuel). However, the 2.0 TSI retains its aftermarket value by 10-15% better.
Frequently asked questions about engines ล KODA Kodiaq
โ Which ล KODA Kodiaq engine is the most reliable?
According to statistics from service centers, the most reliable are: 2.0 TSI (190 hp) and 2.0 TDI (150 hp). The petrol 2.0 TSI has a simple design and requires less repairs up to 200,000 km. The 2.0 TDI diesel is sensitive to fuel, but with proper maintenance it lasts longer than its gasoline counterparts (lifespan up to 400,000 km).
โ Is it possible to install gas on Kodiaq 1.5 TSI or 2.0 TSI?
Officially ล KODA does not recommend installing LPG on turbocharged engines Kodiaq, as this voids the warranty. However, in practice, many owners put gas on 2.0 TSI (4th generation). It is important to use equipment with direct gas injection (for example, Stag 400) and have it configured by certified technicians. For 1.5 TSI installation of HBO is impractical due to its small volume and the risk of overheating.
โ What is the Kodiaq 2.0 TDI's real-world fuel consumption?
Owners Kodiaq 2.0 TDI (150 hp) report the following indicators:
- ๐๏ธ City: 7.5โ8.5 l/100 km (in winter up to 9.5 l).
- ๐ฃ๏ธ Highway (90โ110 km/h): 5.0โ5.5 l/100 km.
- ๐๏ธ Off-road: 9.0โ11.0 l/100 km (depending on load).
For comparison: 2.0 TSI (190 hp) in the city it consumes 11โ13 l/100 km, and on the highway โ 6.5โ7.0 l/100 km.
โ What kind of oil should I put in the Kodiaq 2.0 TSI engine?
Manufacturer recommends oil VW 502 00 (for gasoline engines) or VW 507 00 (for diesel engines). For 2.0 TSI optimal options:
- ๐ข๏ธ Liqui Moly Top Tec 4200 5W-30 โ synthetics, suitable for all climate zones.
- ๐ข๏ธ Castrol Edge Professional LongLife III 5W-30 - original oil for VAG.
- ๐ข๏ธ Mobil 1 ESP 5W-30 โ for regions with frosts below โ30ยฐC.
Oil volume when changing: 5.0 l for 2.0 TSI and 4.5 l for 1.5 TSI. Replacement interval is every 15,000 km or once a year.
โ How long does the timing chain last on a Kodiaq 2.0 TSI?
Timing chain on engines EA888 (2.0 TSI) designed for 150,000โ200,000 km, but its resource depends on operating conditions. Signs of wear:
- ๐ Extraneous noise (rattling sound) during cold start.
- ๐ Floating idle speed.
- โ ๏ธ Error
P0016(camshaft desynchronization).
The cost of replacing a chain with tensioners and oil seals is 40,000โ60,000 rubles. On 1.5 TSI The chain lasts longer (up to 250,000 km), but its replacement is more expensive due to the complexity of the design.